User has not used access key for over 45 days
- Severity
- Low
- Service
- IAM
- Check ID
- USER_HAS_NOT_USED_ACCESS_KEY_FOR_MAX_DAYS
What this check finds
Access keys unused for over 45 days (CIS v5.0 §1.11) should be removed as they may have been lost but still grant access to the account.
Passing looks like: No idle IAM access keys.
How to fix it
Delete or deactivate stale access keys.
AWS CLI
aws iam delete-access-key --user-name USERNAME --access-key-id AKIDTo deactivate first:
aws iam update-access-key --user-name USERNAME --access-key-id AKID --status Inactive
Names in capitals are placeholders for your own resource. Review a command before you run it.
Compliance controls it is evidence for
A failing result counts against these controls in KloudLytics; a passing one is evidence towards them. How compliance mapping works
| Framework | Controls |
|---|---|
| CIS AWS Foundations Benchmark v5.0.0 |
|
| PCI-DSS v4.0.1 |
|
| HIPAA Security Rule |
|
| SOC 2 — Trust Services Criteria |
|
| NIST SP 800-53 Rev5 (Moderate) |
|
| NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 |
|
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A |
|
Checked on every scan
KloudLytics runs this check each time it scans a connected AWS account, through a read-only role, and lists every affected resource with its region. On Pro and Business a fix is written for the specific resource rather than the general case above. The exact access it needs
More IAM checks
- HighDeprecated or flawed AWS managed policy in use
- HighIAM role allows assumption from anywhere
- HighIAM role with admin privileges can be assumed by unexpected principals
- HighIAM role with s3 listing and get privileges can be assumed by unexpected principals
- HighIAM user access key has not been rotated in over 180 days
- HighIncorrect policy used to attempt to enforce MFA
- HighInline policy allows privilege escalation to admin
- HighPrincipal has an attached policy granting administrative access